This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| less than a minute read

The problem with using personality tests for hiring

When considering using any personality assessment as a decision-making tool in hiring, managers need to step back and ask themselves one basic question before giving it to a potential employee: Is this test predictive of future job performance?

In the case of the most common assessment, 4-Qs, the answer is probably not. A 4-Q assessment is one where the results classify you as some combination of four different options labeled as letters, numbers, colors, animals, etc.

These tests tend to be highly transparent, enabling a test taker to manipulate the results in a way that they feel will be viewed favorably by the administrator. Also, since they are designed to measure “states” as opposed to “traits”, there is a significant chance that the results will change over time as the individual’s context changes.

This begs the question: How can an individual’s assessment results be used to predict future job performance? The strongest personality assessments to use in a hiring context are ones that: - Measure stable traits that will not tend to change once the candidate has been on the job. - Are normative in nature, which allows you to compare one candidate’s scores against another’s to determine which individual possess more (or less) of a particular trait. - Have a “candidness” scale so you understand how likely it is that the results accurately portray the test-taker. - Have high reliability and have been shown to be valid predictors of job performance. Even when using a tool that meets the criteria outlined above, personality tests are most effective when combined with other measures with higher predictive validity, such as integrity or cognitive ability.

Tags

executive search, insights